Robert W. May's tumblr Blog

head_left_image

Alberta Oil Sands

The Alberta oilsands are a resource that Canada and the US cannot survive without being developed.  This is a fact.  Alberta and Canada need the jobs and infastructure development that comes from the development of that natural resource.  The economic impact will exceed the entire automotive industry in Ontario or the fisheries our East, or Forestry in BC.  The oilsands will be the largest economic contributor of the next 25 years.

 

With uncertainty in the middle east, this resouce must be developed asap.  Much of the control that the middle east and OPEC has over North America could be alleviated.  Yes, there are economic impacts.  Yes, there is global warming.  Yes, there are potential biological hazards.  However, these concerns will not go away by ignoring the oilsands, as the exploration and development of oil will just relocate to another juristicion or natural resource source.  If they dont dig it up in Alberta, they will dig it up in Brazil, or China, or Russia.

 

I personally would prefer to see the resource extracted by consciencious development here where it can be observed and monitored rather than behind the iron curtain or in some remote area of Siberia where ecological concerns and protections cannot be enforced or are completely non-existant.

 

The answer is not to avoid development, it is to encourage it, but under controlled and cautions guidance.

 

Robert May

 

 

U.S. lobby group defends Alberta's oil sands

As climate change fight heats up, American Petroleum Institute argues that benefits of development will flow to both sides of border

SHAWN MCCARTHY

OTTAWA From Saturday's Globe and Mail

<!-- /#credit -->

GLOBAL ENERGY REPORTER

The U.S. petroleum industry is touting the development of Canada's oil sands as a boon for the American economy and the source of some 343,000 jobs south of the border, as it battles climate change legislation that could hammer crude imports from Alberta.

The American Petroleum Institute, which represents oil sands heavyweights like Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, has long argued the oil sands represents a secure source of oil for the United States.

Now it is making the economic argument that the Alberta development represents one of the largest construction projects in North America - requiring $379-billion (U.S.) in investment over the next 14 years - with benefits flowing on both sides of the border.

"Clearly, Canadian oil sands development is a win-win for both Canada and the United States," said Jack Gerard, the institute's president.

The Washington-based lobby group commissioned a report about the effects of oil sands expansion in the U.S. from the Calgary Energy Research Institute (CERI), a non-profit research body that receives financial support from the Canadian-based oil industry and several provincial and federal governments.

CERI projects oil sands production should climb from 1.2 million barrels per day currently to about four million barrels a day by 2020. Between now and 2025, the industry is expected to invest between $20-billion and $30-billion annually to build the additional capacity, it states.

While most of that money will be spent in Alberta and other provinces, particularly Ontario, the report says U.S. companies would benefit from higher overall economic activity in Canada, as well as direct purchases of capital equipment and financial services from the Alberta-based oil companies.

It forecast the oil sands development would add $40-billion to the U.S. economy by 2020.

"The oil sands reserves play an increasingly important role in the economic development of Alberta, Canada and the United States," the CERI report states. "What is often not clearly understood is that the large investment in the oil sands industry contributes to increased economic activity in the rest of North America by stimulating demand for goods and services across a wide range of industries."

It says oil sands projects, which include the largest surface mines in the world, have equipment needs to match. Companies buy steel products from Alberta, Ontario and the U.S., as well as trucks, shovels, hopper cars, conveyor equipment, pumping equipment and some boilers and chemicals. The CERI study does not include the economic spinoffs from investments in new pipelines and refinery upgrades that will be needed to bring the increasing supplies of Canadian crude to U.S. markets.

The U.S. oil industry is fighting to ensure that climate change legislation now before Congress does not impose undue burdens on Canadian oil imports, either through mandates for low-carbon fuels or through emission caps that penalize refiners who process bitumen from the oil sands.

Canadian companies are also battling to head off overly onerous emission regulations in Canada, which, they say, could stifle growth in a key engine of the domestic economy. Critics argue that governments should force the oil sands companies to cover the full cost of production, including the elimination of greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

"What good is an economic boom if it drives you over a cliff?" said Rick Smith, executive director of Environmental Defence, a Toronto-based environmental group.

"By so thoroughly hitching Canada's economic wagon to the tar sands, we are missing out on the bigger, longer term economic boom, which is the new green economy. And we're going to end up being the peddlers of a product that nobody wants 20 years from now."

lethbridge real estate

lethbridge realtor

Robert W May is a Real Estate Broker in Lethbridge Alberta, having now been in the industry for over 23 years. . He was also a licensed Lethbridge mortgage broker and financing expert with Canada First Mortgage of Calgary Alberta for the past 10 years.  He is an industry leader always willing to help train and educate others in how to improve their business models for financial and personal benefit.




 

 

Comment balloon 2 commentsRobert May • October 18 2009 01:17AM

Comments

Developing the oil we have domestically makes a lot of sense.  Like you say we can do many things here to be sure that the environment is protected that would be impossible in another country.

Posted by Charles Perkins (Charles G. Perkins, CPA) about 10 years ago

Thats one of my strong opinions and something that nobody seems to consider.  Many of the third world countries that this sort of natural resource mining gets exported to is done so without any regulation.  I believe that as long as it is going to happen, lets try to do it the best way possible.

Posted by Robert May, Real estate consulting (Robert W May - Lethbridge Real Estate) about 10 years ago

This blog does not allow anonymous comments